<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ascentum &#187; Michigan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ascentum.com/tag/michigan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ascentum.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:45:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>“Hard Times, Hard Choices”: The power of public deliberation to solve tough problems</title>
		<link>http://ascentum.com/2010/02/11/hard-times-hard-choices-the-power-of-public-deliberation-to-solve-tough-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://ascentum.com/2010/02/11/hard-times-hard-choices-the-power-of-public-deliberation-to-solve-tough-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ellis Westwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary and Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ascentum.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people have access to balanced information about an issue and an opportunity to talk-through policy options with others, they are willing to make tough choices and sacrifices to serve the public interest. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>When people have access to balanced information about an issue and an opportunity to talk-through policy options with others, they <span style="text-decoration: underline;">are</span> willing to make tough choices and sacrifices to serve the public interest.</em></p>
<p>If you pay attention to traditional public opinion polls, it’s easy to get depressed about the public’s capacity to play a productive role in its own governance.  After all, people just want lower taxes <em>and</em> better services, right?</p>
<p>Wrong.</p>
<p>Surveys only scratch the surface and don’t give people the space to really think about a tough problem or issue facing their community.  They only gather knee-jerk or “top of mind” responses.</p>
<p>In stark contrast, a recent public dialogue – the “<a href="http://cdd.stanford.edu/polls/btp/#michigan" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/cdd.stanford.edu/polls/btp/_michigan?referer=');">Hard Times, Hard Choices</a>” project from Michigan – shows the power of deliberation to solve tough problems.   This was no survey.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-776" title="Hard Times, Hard Choices" src="http://ascentum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Hard-Times-Hard-Choices.jpg" alt="Hard Times, Hard Choices" width="217" height="209" />The project brought together a representative sample of over 300 people from across Michigan to recommend directions for the state’s economy and budget.  The organizers used a <strong>Deliberative Polling</strong> approach: the process starts and ends with a poll about key questions, but the interesting part is what happens between these.  Participants learn about the issues through balanced briefings, and then think through options in small groups.   By comparing people’s opinions in the before and after polls, organizers can literally measure deliberation or informed participation.</p>
<p>Here are a few of the results that I found interesting.  You can read the full report <a href="http://cdd.stanford.edu/polls/btp/#michigan" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/cdd.stanford.edu/polls/btp/_michigan?referer=');">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>People actually recommended increasing their taxes</strong>.  By the end of public deliberations, support for increasing income tax had gone up from 27% to 45%.  Similarly, support or raising sales taxes rose from 37% to 51%.</p>
<p><strong>People also recommended decreasing business taxes</strong>.  At the end of the process, support for cutting business taxes rose from 40% to 67%.  They believed it would stimulate businesses and create jobs.</p>
<p>You can actually see footage from “Hard Times, Hard Choices” <a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/video/share.html?s=news01pd8e" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.pbs.org/newshour/video/share.html?s=news01pd8e&amp;referer=');">here</a>.  It’s from a PBS documentary on the project.</p>
<p>- Ellis Westwood -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ascentum.com/2010/02/11/hard-times-hard-choices-the-power-of-public-deliberation-to-solve-tough-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

